New ebooks From Canadian Indies
Description
How can postcolonialism be applied to Canadian literature?
In all that has been written about postcolonialism, surprisingly little has specifically addressed the position of Canada, Canadian literature, or Canadian culture.
Postcolonialism is a theory that has gained credence throughout the world; it is be productive to ask if and how we, as Canadians, participate in postcolonial debates. It is also vital to examine the ways in which Canada and Canadian culture fit into global discussions as our culture reflects how we interact with our neighbours, allies, and adversaries.
This collection wrestles with the problems of situating Canadian literature in the ongoing debates about culture, identity, and globalization, and of applying the slippery term of postcolonialism to Canadian literature. The topics range in focus from discussions of specific literary works to general theoretical contemplations. The twenty-three articles in this collection grapple with the recurrent issues of postcolonialism — including hybridity, collaboration, marginality, power, resistance, and historical revisionism — from the vantage point of those working within Canada as writers and critics. While some seek to confirm the legitimacy of including Canadian literature in the discussions of postcolonialism, others challenge this very notion.
Contributor Notes
Laura Moss is a member of the English Department at the University of British Columbia, and is on the editorial boards of ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature and Studies in Canadian Literature. She edited Frances Brooke’s The History of Emily Montague, and her articles on international authors have appeared in journals and books.
Editorial Reviews
At last is an extended debate on a crucial matter: the relationship between colonialism, postcoloniality, and national discourse. The sheer impossibility of answering the question posed in the title energises lively and informative discussion and debate, illuminating not only the subject of Canadian literatures but issues central to other fields. Twenty-three Canadian intellectuals consider Canada's literary history, the current status of literary discourse, and its likely future. The richness of the coverage, together with the inescapable indeterminacy, is encouraging to those of us who continue to believe in a Canada politically, socially, and intellectually uncompromised.
— Helen Tiffin, University of Queensland, Australia, co-author of <i>The Empire Writes Back</i>
Laura Moss's question, posed to twenty-two Canadian literature specialists, has elicited a fascinating range of responses....The sense of a conversation among the contributors is sustained by frequent cross-referencing among the essays....This is a timely, enjoyable and eminently readable book, which achieves range and diversity without sacrificing coherence.
— Faye Hammill, <i>British Journal of Canadian Studies</i>, 2005 November
Is Canada Postcolonial? raises important and timely, if perhaps unanswerable questions, and offers a number of insightful tentative, non-definitive, and divergent-cum-contradictory answers. Indubitably both the wide-ranging textual analyses and the metacritical contributions open up new areas of thought, and anyone interested in the postcoloniality of Canada will find Moss's book very useful.
— Dunha M. Mohr, Zeitschrift fur Kanada-Studien, 28:2, 2008 December
Is Canada Postcolonial? is a highly readable collection of critical responses to a provocative and timely question. The diverse answers, provided by some of Canada's most eminent scholars, truly unsettle Canadian studies by examining the uses and abuses of currently popular postcolonial critical frameworks in the study of Canada and Canadian literatures.
— Arun P. Mukherjee, associate professor of English, York University
Laura Moss has planted a provocative, timely question and gleaned twenty-two well-ripened critical responses. That the answers aren't 'yes' or 'no' but 'it depends' and 'let's keep debating it' makes this gathering both quintessentially Canadian and paradigmatically postcolonial. Here is where we can begin reorienting CanLit criticism for this unsettling new century.
— John Clement Ball, editor, Studies in Canadian Literature/Études en littérature canadienne
Reflects...[and] extends current academic research and practice.
— Christl Verduyn, University of Toronto Quarterly – Letters in Canada 2003, 2005 October
